共同饮酒法律责任实证研究

通过对我国涉及共同饮酒的142个侵权案件的判决理由进行类型化分析发现,根据法院判决对注意义务的认定,可以区分为"危险防范义务"、"安全保障义务"、"法定附随义务"、"一般注意义务"等。通过在法理上对这些注意义务的来源进行辨析,其均存在一定问题。在与此相关的侵权案件审理中,法官通过扩大注意义务范围对社会交往规则进行调整,以司法政策为导向的过错认定有一定弊端,应当在侵权案件审理中坚持司法克制。

Empirical Research on Legal Responsibility of Joint-drinking Infringement Cases

Based on the differences in duty of care, this paper categorizes the grounds of decision of 142 joint-drinking infringement cases in China into risk prevention obligation, security obligation, legal accompanying obligation and general duty of care, etc..Through analyzing the source of the above duty of care, there are some problems.Drawbacks exist in cases when judges adjust social interaction rules by expanding the scope of duty of care, and also in the judicial policy oriented fault identification, therefore one should keep the judicial restraint in the cases of infringement.