| 品格证据规则研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄士元,吴丹红.品格证据规则研究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2002,10(4):82-94. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄士元 吴丹红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东大学,法学院,山东,济南,250100
2. 中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 品格证据规则作为证据法学的重要内容 ,并没有得到我国证据法学界的应有的重视。事实上 ,品格证据具有逻辑上的相关性 ,只是可能带来推理性偏见和伦理性偏见。英美法系国家的立法和判例较为合理地解决了这一冲突 ,值得我国借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 品格证据 逻辑相关性 偏见 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9428(2002)04-0082-13 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年3月20日 |
Study on Rules of Character Evidence |
| |
| HUANG Shi-yuan ,WU Dan-hong.Study on Rules of Character Evidence[J].Journal of National Procurators College,2002,10(4):82-94. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Shi-yuan WU Dan-hong |
| |
| Institution: | HUANG Shi-yuan 1,WU Dan-hong 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | As an important part of the law of evidence, the rule of character evidence has not been paid enough attention. In fact, character evidence has some logical relevance, though they may bring reasoning prejudice and moral prejudice. In Anglo-American legal system, this conflict has been resolved reasonably, which provides good experiences for Chinese practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | character evidence logical relevance prejudice |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
