| 刑法第四百三十八条第二款的理解与适用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冉巨火.刑法第四百三十八条第二款的理解与适用[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2014(6):99-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冉巨火 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法大学军事法研究中心,陕西西安710063 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金青年项目“军职罪修改的体系化设计研究”（12CFX037）的阶段性研究成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法第四百三十八条第二款同样是特殊法条,将该款规定中的"处罚"解释为"定罪处罚"不具有正当性,军人盗窃、抢夺部队枪支、弹药、爆炸物的行为应认定为盗窃、抢夺武器装备罪。出于罪刑相适应的考虑,对上述行为量刑时应适用刑法第一百二十七条第二款的法定刑。从立法论角度来看,刑法第四百三十八条第二款的规定存在缺陷。对此,可经由补正解释的路径来纠正这一错误。
|
| 关 键 词： | 盗窃、抢夺武器装备罪 盗窃、抢夺枪支、弹药、爆炸物罪 补正解释 |
The Understanding and Application of Paragraph 2 Article 438 of the Criminal Law |
| |
| Institution: | RAN Ju - huo(Researeh Centre of Military Law, Northwest University of Polities and Law, Xi＇ an Shaan Xi China 710063 ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Paragraph 2 article 438 of the Criminal Law is also a special law. It is improper to interpret the word ＂punished＂ here as ＂convicted and punished＂. The action of an army man＇ s stealing or seizing firearms, ammuni- tion or explosives should be convicted as the crime of stealing or seizing weaponry. Considering the principle of suit- ing punishment to Crime, the sentencing should apply to paragraph 2 article 127 of the Criminal Law. There is a flaw in paragraph 2 article 438 from the legislative perspective, which can be corrected by amendable interpreta- tions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Crime of stealing or seizing weaponry Crime of stealing or seizing firearms ammunition or explosives Amendable interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
