以程序性制裁弥补实体性制裁之不足

为了抑制刑讯逼供的发生,我国确立了包括追究刑事责任、处以行政处分、判令承担民事赔偿责任等在内的多种直接对刑讯者本人进行实体性处罚的制裁措施。现阶段,众多因素限制了这些实体制裁措施效用的有效发挥。其中部分因素虽然在理论上可以通过诉讼制度变革予以消除,但是这些变革都较为重大,何时实现乃至能否实现都还是个问题,而部分因素则不可能通过制度变革予以消除。我国有必要建立和完善程序性裁判机制,使最高人民法院司法解释所确立的程序性制裁能发挥效用,并与实体性制裁互相配合,以抑制刑讯的发生。

Using the Procedural Sanctions to Eliminate the Limitation of the Substantial Sanction

There are many ways in our country to restrain the detective from extorting a confession by torture,including penal sanction,administrative punishment,and civil liability.At the same time,many factors preventing these punishment working.Some factors can be eliminated by reforms,but those reforms are so big that it is very difficult to forecast when the reforms can be finished,even whether or not the reforms will be carried out.The other factors will never be eliminated.It is necessary for us to establish and perfect procedural sanction mechanism,which will work with the substantial sanction to cut down the torture.