首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Democratising online content moderation: A constitutional framework
Institution:1. Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) Law School, Brasil;2. Associate Professor of Law, University of Leeds, United Kingdom;1. Department of Communication and Media Research (IKMZ), University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, CH-8050 Zürich;2. eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, Steenschuur 25, 2311 ES Leiden, The Netherlands;3. Department of Communication and Culture, BI Norwegian Business School, Nydalsveien 37, 0484 Oslo, Norway;4. Center for Information Technology, Society, and Law (ITSL), University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 74 / 38, CH-8001 Zürich;5. Digital Life Initiative at Cornell Tech & Information Law Institute at NYU School of Law, Affiliate at Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, United States
Abstract:Freedom of expression is one of the cornerstones on which democracy is based. This non-exhaustive statement firmly clashes with the troubling evolution of the algorithmic society where artificial intelligence technologies govern the flow of information online according to opaque technical standards established by social media platforms. These actors are usually neither accountable nor responsible for contents uploaded or generated by the users. Nevertheless, online content moderation affects users’ fundamental rights and democratic values, especially since online platforms autonomously set standards for content removal on a global scale. Despite their crucial role in governing the flow of information online, social media platforms are not required to ensure transparency and explanation of their decision-making processes. Within this framework, this work aims to show how the liberal paradigm of protection of the right to free speech is no longer enough to protect democratic values in the digital environment, since the flow of information is actively organised by business interests, driven by profit-maximisation rather than democracy, transparency or accountability. The role of free speech is still paramount. However, the challenges raised by the algorithmic society leads to focus on enhancing the positive dimension of this fundamental right by introducing new users’ rights and transparency and accountability obligations for social media to inject democratic values in the digital environment.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号