| 法益保护不断前置、总体趋严的刑事立法——历次刑法修正案背后的刑事政策解读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邢飞龙.法益保护不断前置、总体趋严的刑事立法——历次刑法修正案背后的刑事政策解读[J].天水行政学院学报,2013(4):97-100. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邢飞龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从1999年《刑法修正案》到2011年《刑法修正案（八）》，仅仅12年时间，我国刑法就新增了34个罪名。在入罪方面，犯罪门槛不断降低，危险犯立法模式不断增多；量刑方面，尽管取消了13个死刑罪名，但刑罚总体趋严。这些罪刑变化的背后不仅表现出我国刑法对安全刑法理论的回应，更表明我国刑法对积极一般预防学说的采纳，刑事违法性实质从结果无价值向行为无价值的转变。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法修正案 罪刑变化 刑事政策 |
Criminal Legislation with Prepositive Protection of Legal Interest and Increasing Strictness --Analysis of criminal policies behind eight amendments to criminal law |
| |
| Authors: | XING Fei-long |
| |
| Institution: | XING Fei-long (China University of Political Science and Law , Beijing100088, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In 12 years, Criminal Law has added 34 charges from the first amendment in 1999 to the eighth amendment in 2011. In incrimination, the limit of crime has gone lower and lower, and legislature model of potential damage offenses has gone more and more. In penalty measurement, though 13 death penalty charges have been cancelled, the main trend of penalty is more strict. What behind these changes is not only criminal law＇s response to theory of safe criminal law, but also the adoption of theory of positive general prevention, and the nature of criminal illegality has turned from anti-value acts to anti-value consequences. |
| |
| Keywords: | amendment to criminal law crime and punishment changes criminal policies |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
