美国惩治国际恐怖分子的法律选择问题

美国十多年来的反恐战略、手段与措施较此前是极大的挑战，甚至突破了既有国际政治框架和国际法律秩序所能够容忍的限度。美国政府扩张武装冲突的外延、新设全球反恐战争概念、避开平时刑法试图选择适用武装冲突法以获得更多的战时特权，其目的是为定点清除找到正当根据，为反恐措施披上合法外衣。但是，选择适用武装冲突法，进而采取军事手段“以暴制暴”，无助于最恰当和最有效地惩治国际恐怖分子。美国政府在巩固既有反恐成果的同时，应当积极反思其错误适用反恐法律所导致的消极后果，以确保其惩治国际恐怖分子法律选择的恰当性与有效性。

Choice of the Laws of the United States to Punish International Terrorists

Compare for before, the United States for more than ten years to counter-terrorism strategy, means and measures is a great challenge. It even broke through both the international politi- cal framework and the international law order can tolerant limit. The United States government ex- pansion the extension of armed conflict, the newly established the global war on terror to avoid the criminal law concept, usually try to choose suitable armed conflict method to get more wartime privi- lege, which is designed for finding proper according to fixed point clear to and for the anti-terrorism measures with legal coat. But, choose the applicable of armed conflict, and then take military means ＂violence with violence＂, not the most appropriate and most effectively punish such international terrorists. At the same time the United States government in consolidating anti-terrorism results, It should actively reflect on its error applicable anti-terrorism laws caused by the negative conse- quences, to ensure its appropriateness and effectiveness of choice of law of the punishment of interna- tional terrorists.