首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

形式论证与实质论证的共振——法律推理模式的科学构建
引用本文:张继成. 形式论证与实质论证的共振——法律推理模式的科学构建[J]. 江南社会学院学报, 2001, 3(2): 42-45,60
作者姓名:张继成
作者单位:中南财经政法大学公安学院,湖北,武汉,430074
摘    要:法律推理的科学模式应是形式论证与实质论证的有机统一.实质论证解决法律推理大小前提的真实性、合理性问题,它是法律推理的外部证明过程;形式论证解决前提之间以及前提与结论之间的逻辑联系,它是法律推理的内部证明过程.只有这样才能使法律的形式合理性(形式正义)与实质合理性(实质正义)在法律推理中得到和谐的统一.

关 键 词:形式论证  实质论证  简单论证模式  复杂论证模式
修稿时间:2001-01-08

The Resonance of Formal and Substantial Reasoning--The Construction of the Scientific Mode of Legal Deduction
ZHANG Ji-cheng. The Resonance of Formal and Substantial Reasoning--The Construction of the Scientific Mode of Legal Deduction[J]. Journal of Jiangnan Social University, 2001, 3(2): 42-45,60
Authors:ZHANG Ji-cheng
Abstract:This paper holds that the scientific mode of legal deduction should be the organic unification of formal reasoning and substantial reasoning .As the external process of legal deduction, substantial reasoning solves the problem of the authenticity, rationality, and validity of the major premise and minor premise of legal deduction. Formal reasoning, which is the internal reasoning process of legal deduction, solves the problem of the logic ralationship between premises and conclusion. Only through these process can the harmonious unification of formal rationality and substantial rationality of law be achieved in legal deduction.
Keywords:Subsantial Demonstration  Formal Demonstration  Complex Demonstrative Mode  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号