| 司法判决过程中的道德论证 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许娟. 司法判决过程中的道德论证[J]. 法学论坛, 2012, 0(2): 64-69 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许娟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南民族大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 当非理性民权表达充斥司法判决之时,势必要澄清和阐明司法判决过程中的道德论证,势必要在柔性实证主义(分离命题)和吸纳性整体阐释(统一命题)之间交往商谈,从这个意义上说,道德是可以论证的。在司法判决现实情境之下,道德论证在大前提论证中起到经验论证、非实证和非经验论证两项作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道德论证 权利话语 理性论辩 程序 |
The Moral Argument in the Process of Judicial Decisions |
| |
| XU Juan. The Moral Argument in the Process of Judicial Decisions[J]. Legal Forum, 2012, 0(2): 64-69 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Juan |
| |
| Affiliation: | XU Juan(Law School,Central South University for Nationalities,Wuhan Hubei 430074,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | When irrational civil rights expression occupy judicial decision,is bound to clarify and to clarify the moral argument in the process of judicial decisions,is bound to discuss the interaction between the flexible positivism and absorbing whole explanation.In this sense,morality is arguable.Under the realistic scenarios of judicial decisions,the moral argument play two roles including experience demonstrated,non-empirical and non-experience,demonstrated in the premise of the argument. |
| |
| Keywords: | moral argument rights discourse rational argument program |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
