| 停止条件之此较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周哨龙.停止条件之此较研究[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2007,22(2):50-54. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周哨龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学政法学院,安徽 芜湖,241000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 比较研究表明,大陆法系国家立法上赋予了停止条件不同的法律意义.在德国法下,停止条件是法律行为生效的特别要件;而根据法国法,它是债权合同履行的条件.其中后者更具合理性.此外,各国法在停止条件的具体法律效果的规定上也存在一些差异.
|
| 关 键 词： | 停止条件 法律行为 法律效力 生效 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2007)02-0050-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年12月13 |
A Comparative Study On Conditions Precedent |
| |
| ZHOU Shao-long.A Comparative Study On Conditions Precedent[J].Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law,2007,22(2):50-54. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Shao-long |
| |
| Abstract: | As the comparative study shows, conditions precedent has different meaning in different legal systems. Under Germen legal system, conditions precedent is a special requirement for a juristic act to take effect, while according to French Code Civil, it is only a requirement for the performance of a contract. The latter is more desirable. Besides, there still differences in details on the legal effects of conditions precedent to the juristic act to which it attaches. |
| |
| Keywords: | Conditions Precedent Juristic Act Legal Effect Taking effect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
