首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

离婚诉权不平等之检讨——兼评我国《婚姻法》第34条
引用本文:张加文,李胜华.离婚诉权不平等之检讨——兼评我国《婚姻法》第34条[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2002,14(1):41-44.
作者姓名:张加文  李胜华
作者单位:中南财经政法大学,湖北,武汉,430073
摘    要:男女离婚诉权平等是平等的要求.在妇女怀孕期间、分娩后一年内和中止妊娠后六个月内限制男方离婚诉权不利于对女方、男方、子女权益和社会整体利益的保护,也违背了婚姻法自身体系的一致性,其实施效果也极差;它是计划经济体制下漠视诉权、固守传统婚恋观念、固守厌讼观念的产物.<婚姻法>第34条应废除.

关 键 词:婚姻法  离婚诉权  婚烟  平等
文章编号:1671-5195(2002)01-0041-04
修稿时间:2001年10月2日

Questioning of Being Unequal to the Parties' Cause of Action to Divorce
ZHANG Jia-wen,LI Sheng-hua.Questioning of Being Unequal to the Parties'''' Cause of Action to Divorce[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2002,14(1):41-44.
Authors:ZHANG Jia-wen  LI Sheng-hua
Abstract:The equality of the husband and wife in the cause of action to divorce is the requirement of the equality of man and woman. It's harmful to protect the interests of wife, husband, child and the society as a whole to restrain the husband's cause of action to divorce during the period of his spouse's pregnancy, within one year after protection and within six months after the suspend of pregnancy, which also violates the coherence of the system of Marriage Law, producing very bad effect of enforcement, and which is the product of ignorance of cause of action, adherent to the traditional opinions on marriage and disliking litigation under the system of planned economy. The artiele 34 of Chinese Marriage Law should be abolished.
Keywords:Marriage Law  divorce  cause of action  marriage  equality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号