| 刑法究竟有无目的:一个前序性之辩 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 贾健.刑法究竟有无目的:一个前序性之辩[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2014(4):98-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 贾健 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学法学院,中国重庆401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2013年中国法学会研究课题“后权威时代刑法解释理论的新拓展”（CLS2013D174）的阶段性成果;2012年度国家社科基金项目“刑事司法过程的刑法学建构问题研究”（12BFX055）的阶段性成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法目的论首要的问题是要回答刑法是否有目的?而刑法有无目的,涉及法律究竟有没有目的的问题。对此,法律盲进主义与后现代理论均从各自的进路提出了否定性的质疑。但前者否定的真意是认为法律不存在一个先验的、全能的康德意义上的目的,而后者的真意是提醒我们注意法律的权力异化。刑法(法律)的目的在社会需要的意义层面上是可以成立的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法目的 法律盲目进化主义 后现代理论 |
Is There a Purpose of Criminal Law？ ： A pre -order Debate |
| |
| JIA Jian.Is There a Purpose of Criminal Law？ ： A pre -order Debate[J].Journal of Henan Public Security Academy,2014(4):98-102. |
| |
| Authors: | JIA Jian |
| |
| Institution: | JIA Jian ( Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing China 401120 ) |
| |
| Abstract: | The first question on teleology of criminal law is to answer whether there is a purpose of criminal law？ This question is related to whether there is a purpose of the law. In this regard, both legal blindness and post- modem theory proposed negativity question from their approach. But the real intention of what the former denied is that no a priori, Kant＇ s sense of purpose exsited in the law, while the real intention of latter＇ s is to remind us of power alienation of the law. The purpose of criminal law in the significance level of the social needs can be estab- lished. |
| |
| Keywords: | Criminal law purposes Legal blind evolutionary doctrine Postmodern theory |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
