变造货币罪比较研究

尽管各国刑法大多在妨害货币犯罪中对变造货币行为予以规定 ,但是立法模式却各不相同。对其客观要件 ,中外刑法理论均认为是没有货币发行权的人 ,对于真实的货币进行加工 ,使其价值改变的行为 ,但我国尚有“数额较大”之标准。对其主观要件 ,中外刑法均认为只能由故意构成 ,但对本罪是否为目的犯则有不同的看法。此外 ,中外刑法理论对本罪的既遂与未遂标准等 ,亦有不同的划分。

Comparative Studies on the Crime of Altering Currency

Criminal laws of different countries have regulations on the crime of altering currency, but they vary in the patterns of legislation. About objective conditions, both Chinese and foreign theories of criminal law hold that this crime is committed to rerocess real money to change its value by the person with no issue right, while China has such a standard as "comparatively large number". About subjective conditions, both Chinese and foreign criminal laws believe that it can only be dne deliberately, but they hold different views on whether this crime is intentional or not. Besides, the criteria of whether it's attempted or accomplished are different.