合同纠纷中精神障碍者民事行为能力评定

目的寻找并确证合同纠纷中精神障碍者民事行为能力评定的考量的指标。方法回顾性收集合同纠纷中精神障碍民事行为能力评定案例中被鉴定人相关资料；对所提炼民事行为能力评定应当考量的6项指标，即处境认识、争端理解、结果认识、信息利用、环境功能和决定交流进行评定与分析。结果纳入与精神障碍者民事行为评定相关的合同纠纷案例56例，所有案例中民事行为能力均实行三级划分，即完全民事行为能力、限制民事行为能力、无民事行为能力。合同类型主要集中于两类，与房屋相关合同38例，劳动合同14例。经统计发现各考量指标与专家鉴定结论的相关性较高，相关系数0．703～0．834，6项指标内部相关性高，相关系数0．712～0．877。结论合同纠纷中精神障碍者民事行为能力可实行三级划分，上述6项指标对精神障碍者的民事行为评定具有较强代表性，可以此为基础进一步开展民事行为能力评定标准化和量化研究。

Civil Competence Assessment of the Mental Disorders Involved in Contract Dispute

Objective To search the criteria for evaluating the civil competence of the mental disorders involved in contract dispute. Methods Data on the interviewee＇s mental status and the forensic expertise were collected retrospectively. And 6 indexes were selected and graded： awareness of situation, factual understanding of issues, appreciation of likely consequences, rational manipulation of information, functioning in one＇s own environment and communication of choice. All of the data were analyzed by SPSS. Results Fifty six cases were included and interviewee＇s civil competence was graded to three levels： full civil competence, diminished civil competence, and no civil competence. These cases included two types of contract： the real estate related contract（38 cases）and the labor related contract（14 cases）. All of the 6 indexes were well correlated to the forensic expertise. The related coefficient was from 0.703 to 0.834, and the interrelated coefficient of the 6 items was also high, from 0.712 to 0.877. Conclusion It is feasible to divide the civil competence of the mental disorders into three grades. As the basis, these 6 indexes mentioned above are representative and can be applied in further standardized and quantified assessment of civil competence .