| 专用性投资、劳动者保护与劳动合同解除权 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙良国.专用性投资、劳动者保护与劳动合同解除权[J].当代法学,2006(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙良国 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学法学院 吉林长春130012 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 现代劳动法要实现专用性投资和劳动者的双重保护,而不能仅仅强调劳动者保护绝对主义。目前主流观点将《劳动法》第31条理解为赋予劳动者单方解除权的观点是有缺陷的,其没有认真对待专用性投资保护以及劳动合同自身要求的对合同期限的合理规定。涉及专用性投资的劳动合同的当事人解除劳动合同,必须向对方支付合理的补偿,否则法律可以对其进行适当的限制。同时,法律法规也应当确立补偿费的标准。
|
| 关 键 词： | 专用性投资 劳动者保护 劳动合同 解除权 |
Specific Investment, Protection of Labourer and the Right to Discharge Labor Contract |
| |
| SUN Liang-guo.Specific Investment, Protection of Labourer and the Right to Discharge Labor Contract[J].Contemporary Law Review,2006(5). |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Liang-guo |
| |
| Abstract: | Modern labor law should protect both specific investment and labors. Mainstream opinions regard that Article 31 of Labor Law of PRC empower the labors absolute right to discharge contract, which has vital defect. The labors should pay fair compensation to employer if they breach of contract. At the same time, law should make more reasonable compensation standards. |
| |
| Keywords: | specific investment protection of labourer labor contract right to discharge the labor contract |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
