扩张解释与类推解释之界分——近代法治的一个美丽谎言

扩张解释与类推解释间的微妙关系,一直困扰着尊崇近代刑法理念的学人和法律实践者。但至少到目前为止,对二者所做的区分由于区分标准本身的含混与模糊而无法令人信服。实际上,二者在思维模式上本无实质区别,学术界所做的这些所谓区别工作,仅仅是为了迎合近代法治意识形态的需要。但一个事实是,以罪刑法定主义为基石的近代法治原则,并不是我们所想象的那样坚实,因此,针对扩张解释和类推解释所做的区分工作,也许应该停止了。

The partition of extensive interpretation and analogy interpretation:A great lie of modern rule of law

The subtile relations of extensive interpretation and analogy interpretation have puzzled the jurists and others law worker who believe law of law.At least so far,the distinctions,having been done by jurists,between extensive interpretation and analogy interpretation have weak conviction because of the ambiguous of standard itself.In fact,in the view of thinking mode,there is no difference between extensive interpretation and analogy interpretation.Catering to the need of rule of law is the only purpose of ...