搜查理由及其证明标准比较研究

搜查作为对权利人“基本权利之侵犯”行为 ,国外及我国台湾等地区的法律在确定司法令状予以节制门槛后 ,仍难以避免搜查权力过度张扬而克扣、缩减个人正当权利 ,于是确立了搜查理由作为第二门槛 ,对此的证明标准因犯罪严重程度、搜查对象保护程度、搜查时间不同、被搜查权利人阻碍等差异设置了不同层次的要求。我国刑事诉讼法再修正时应借鉴其有益经验 ,在确立司法令状 (司法审查 )的框架内 ,针对搜查的不同情况 ,规定相应的搜查理由及其证明标准

A Comparative Study of the Reasons for Search and Relevant Criterions of Proof

Search, which may infringe upon the basic rights of the obligee, is supervised by means of the judicial writ according to the laws of China's Taiwan and some foreign countries, but the still inevitable abuse of the search right narrows a person's' legitimate rights. Thus, the reasons for search shall be clarified to further impose necessary restrictions upon it. In view of the crime's severity, the protection of the search target, the different time, the obstruction from the search-receiving person, the criterions of proof with different levels of requirements shall be established. China shall, when amending its criminal procedure law, use for reference the aforesaid beneficial practice, by means of establishing the system of judicial writ (judicial inspection) and stipulating the reasons for search and relevant criterions of proof in correspondence with various circumstances of search.