Defending a cosmopolitanism without illusions. Reply to my critics |
| |
Authors: | Seyla Benhabib |
| |
Institution: | Political Science and Philosophy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This essay engages with several critiques of my project a ‘cosmopolitanism without illusions.’ Who is the subject of rights? What are the objects of rights? Is there a distinction between human and moral rights? Furthermore, what is prior in this cosmopolitan account: democracy or human rights? Do democratic iterations exhaust the meaning of principles of rights? Finally, does the ‘scarf affair’ really signify the return of ‘political theology’ or have not such disputes always accompanied secularization and modernity? I argue that moral rights comprise more than human rights and that non-human beings such as animals can have moral rights claims against us. Democratic iterations and rights complement one another; neither is prior and that although debates about religion and secularization have been endemic to modernity, the return of references to Carl Schmitt’s ‘political theology’ is rather new. |
| |
Keywords: | cosmopolitanism human rights democratic iterations the scarf affair political theology |
|
|