首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“计赃论罪”的历史考察与现实变革
引用本文:杨志国.“计赃论罪”的历史考察与现实变革[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2008,20(2).
作者姓名:杨志国
作者单位:上海市人民检察院第二分院,上海,200070
摘    要:我国古代关于盗窃罪的立法有着"计赃论罪"的传统,而这一立法传统在近代经过短暂的断裂后,又在新中国的刑事立法中得以体现。新中国刑法中的"计赃论罪"在内涵上与古代刑法中的"计赃论罪"并不完全相同,主要表现在从定性分析模式到定性+定量分析模式的演变。这种演变,与盗窃行为社会危害性程度的变化、我国传统文化心理以及现实刑事政策密不可分。无论在理论上还是在实践中,纯粹的"计赃论罪"立法模式都已丧失了生存的空间,我国盗窃罪应当确立"双轨制"的立法模式。

关 键 词:盗窃罪  计赃论罪  双轨制

Historical Investigation and Present Transformation of "Determining Penalty by Counting Booties"
YANG Zhiguo.Historical Investigation and Present Transformation of "Determining Penalty by Counting Booties"[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2008,20(2).
Authors:YANG Zhiguo
Institution:YANG Zhiguo(The 2nd branch court of Shanghai People s Procuratorate; Shanghai 20070; China);
Abstract:There was a tradition of "determining penalty by counting booties"in Chinese ancient legislation.Such tradition has been embodied in New China's criminal legislation again after a short rupture.The connotation of "determining penalty by counting booties"in New China's legislation is different from the ancient one because New China's legislation developed the qualitative analysis mode into qualitative and quantitative analysis mode.The development has a close relationship with the changes of theft crime's harm degree to society,Chinese traditional cultural psychology,and present criminal policy.Both in theory and practice,there're no room for the existence of pure legislative mode of "determining penalty by counting booties".In China,theft crime should establish legislative mode of "dual-system".
Keywords:theft crime  determining penalty by counting booties  dual-system
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号