首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

沉默权应否入宪
引用本文:谭红,唐爱元.沉默权应否入宪[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2005,17(4):83-86.
作者姓名:谭红  唐爱元
作者单位:1. 北京大学,北京,100871
2. 湖南大学,湖南,长沙,410006
摘    要:沉默权应不应当入宪,还存在着激烈的争论。从宪政的基本价值及长远理想来看,我国现行宪法应予确认犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的沉默权。但人权受到各种主客观条件的限制和制约,具有渐进性,沉默权入宪会增加公安机关的负担,造成人、财、物的浪费,就我国目前情况来看,沉默权入宪应当缓行。

关 键 词:沉默权  入宪  缓行
文章编号:1008-7575(2005)04-0083-04
修稿时间:2005年4月11日

Whether Reticent Right Enters the Constitution
TAN Hong,TANG Ai-yuan.Whether Reticent Right Enters the Constitution[J].Journal of Huan Public Security College,2005,17(4):83-86.
Authors:TAN Hong  TANG Ai-yuan
Institution:TAN Hong~1,TANG Ai-yuan~2
Abstract:There still exists fierce dispute whether the reticent right enters the constitution. Affirmative saying and deny saying have described one's own reason. According to the basic value of the constitutional and long-term ideal, the current constitution of our country deserves to confirm the reticent right of the suspect and defendant. But human rights is limited by various kinds of subjective and objective conditions and restriction, has advancing gradually nature, reticent right enters constitution can increase burden of public security organ, cause the waste of the manpower, financial resources and material resources, but so far as situation at present in our country, the entering should walk slowly .
Keywords:reticent right  entering the constitution  walking slowly
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号