如何理解疏忽大意的过失中的"应当预见"

疏忽大意的过失成立的前提是行为人"应当预见"自己的行为可能发生危害社会的结果,而"应当预见"包含行为人的预见义务、预见能力、可预见性和危害社会的法定的结果。其中,如何认定"预见能力"是刑法学界争议的焦点,对此,主要形成了主观说、客观说和折衷说。但这三种学说都不能完满地解决行为人的预见能力问题,笔者对此进行了简要的评析,认为只有将预见能力理解为"排除行为人不应有的人格缺陷后"的人的修正的主观标准,才能恰当地解释疏忽大意的过失的预见能力的问题。

How to Comprehend"Should Foresee"of Negligence Faulty

The premise that negligence faulty establishes is that a behavior person should to foresee own behavior that may result in the social endangers. What should foresee include behavior the duty to foresee, the ability to foresee etc. Among them, how to affirm the ability to foresee is a focus in criminal law educational.Now, there primarily are three theories: subjective theory, objective theory and compromised theory. But these three theories can't satisfactorily solute the behavior the ability to foresee .I believe in that if we want to solve the problem, we only comprehend the ability to foresee as a modified subjective standard that is to expel the behavior personality blemish which a person shouldn't have.