首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事证据排除裁判及其效力
引用本文:戴锐.民事证据排除裁判及其效力[J].证据科学,2011,19(4):425-430.
作者姓名:戴锐
作者单位:中国人民公安大学
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“证据科学的理论体系与应用研究”,中国博士后科学基金面上项目资助
摘    要:证据排除纠纷的主体是当事人,当事人对于解决这种纠纷应当享有处分与主导的权利。因此应当给予当事人以基本的听证保障,构建起正当的证据排除程序。而合适的裁判形式的选择也关系到当事人的权利保障和法院职权的顺利行使。中间判决是适合于民事证据排除的裁判形式。民事证据排除裁判具备争点效。应当在我国构建合适的证据排除裁判。

关 键 词:证据适格性  证据排除裁判  争点效

On the Judgment and Effect of the Evidence Exclusion in Civil Procedure
Dai Rui.On the Judgment and Effect of the Evidence Exclusion in Civil Procedure[J].Evidence Science,2011,19(4):425-430.
Authors:Dai Rui
Institution:Dai Rui,Chinese People’s Public Security University
Abstract:Parties are the subjects of civil disputes over qualification of evidence,so the parties must acquire the position to dominate the resolution of disputes.The parties should be given an opportunity to attend the hearing,and it is very necessary to establish a proper exclusionary procedure of evidence to guarantee the parties' rights.Meantime,choosing a proper form of judgment is also very important to protect the parties' rights and to ensure the execution of judicial power.The interlocutory judgment is the proper form in the civil exclusionary procedure.The judgment in the civil exclusionary procedure must maintain the effect of the reason.China should establish a proper judgment in the civil exclusionary procedure.
Keywords:Qualification of evidence  Judgment of an exclusionary procedure  Remedy system  Effect of reason
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号