首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《加强美国法庭科学之路》的反响和启示
引用本文:邢学毅.《加强美国法庭科学之路》的反响和启示[J].证据科学,2011,19(4):445-456.
作者姓名:邢学毅
作者单位:证据科学教育部重点实验室
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目《事实调查模式下的证据管理研究》研究成果,教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金资助,中国政法大学校级人文社会科学研究项目资助
摘    要:美国科学院国家研究顾问委员会2009年2月发布的《加强美国法庭科学之路》明确指出目前美国法庭科学领域的很多学科存在严重缺陷,不能很好地为司法审判服务。本文通过对该报告出台背景和一年多来的争论和反响进行分析,对其披露的问题和提出的建议进行了详细解读。目前其主要争议存在于设立独立的国家法庭科学研究院和隔离法庭科学机构与执法...

关 键 词:法庭科学  司法鉴定  专家证人

Feedbacks and Suggestions of ′Strengthening Forensic Science In The United States:A Path Forward′
Xing Xueyi.Feedbacks and Suggestions of ′Strengthening Forensic Science In The United States:A Path Forward′[J].Evidence Science,2011,19(4):445-456.
Authors:Xing Xueyi
Institution:Xing Xueyi,Key Laboratory of Evidence Science(China University of Political Science and Law),the Ministry of Education,Beijing,100088
Abstract:"Strengthening Forensic Science In The United States: A Path Forward",published by National Research Council of NAS in February 2009,pointed that there were serious deficiencies in the current United States forensic science system and many subjects actually were not reliable in Forensic practice.By deliberately analyzing the background of its publication and the debates and feedbacks after its publication,this thesis shows that major arguments still exist in whether to build a whole new National Forensic Science Institute,and whether to keep the criminal labs independent from the law enforcement departments.This report could be a good reference to China′s forensic science system reform.All of the transparent decision procedure,multilevel policies and comprehensive approaches could be a good example to China′s forensic science development.
Keywords:Forensic science  Forensic appraisal  Expert witness
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号