| 非法监听所获材料之证据能力的比较法考察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓立军.非法监听所获材料之证据能力的比较法考察[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2008,24(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓立军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东商学院,广东,广州,510320 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从程序正义的视角加以解读,非法监听主要有违反法定程序的秘密监听、他案监听、附带监听和一方当事人监听等表现形式.其中,违反法定程序的秘密监听与他案监听系两种典型的非法监听行为,其所获材料应予排除,不具有证据能力.附带监听和一方当事人监听在程序上也存在瑕疵,其所获材料是否具有证据能力,需要区分不同情况予以处理.
|
| 关 键 词： | 秘密监听 非法监听 证据排除 |
Probe about the Testify Ability of Materials Getting by Illegal Monitoring in Approach of Comparative Law |
| |
| DENG Li-jun.Probe about the Testify Ability of Materials Getting by Illegal Monitoring in Approach of Comparative Law[J].Journal of Chinese People‘s Public Security University:Social Sciences Edition,2008,24(4). |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Li-jun |
| |
| Institution: | DENG Li-jun(Business College in Guangdong,Guangdong Guangzhou 510320,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Illegal monitoring includes mainly secret monitoring of violating procedure law,monitoring of other case,incidental monitoring and monitoring of one party from the visual angle of procedure justice.Among them the secret monitoring of violating procedure law and monitoring of other cases are typical conducts of illegal monitoring,the materials about both of them are without testify ability,which should be rejected.The nature of other two kinds has been in discussing situation. |
| |
| Keywords: | secret monitoring illegal monitoring exclusive testimony |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
