| 判例法的“溯及力困境”及其制度性克服 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 魏治勋.判例法的“溯及力困境”及其制度性克服[J].北方法学,2011,5(5):5-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 魏治勋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | ＂奥斯丁困境＂的起因是法官在司法过程中适用社会规范引起的合法性问题。＂奥斯丁困境＂的提问方式及其问题可以转化为：通过什么样的判例法上的制度性操作能够缓解＂溯及力困境＂并达成司法判决的公正性。德沃金和哈特关于＂社会规则理论＂的争论使我们认识到社会命题在决定判例法规则方面的重要性,而普通法已经发展起来的司法基本原则、标准、推理模式和制度性原则则为＂溯及力困境＂及判决的公正性问题的解决提供了较为全面的制度实践上的保障。
|
| 关 键 词： | 判例法 社会规则 公正性 |
On＂Retroactive Dilemma＂ of Case Law and Its Institutional Resolution |
| |
| WEI Zhi-xun.On＂Retroactive Dilemma＂ of Case Law and Its Institutional Resolution[J].Northern Legal Science,2011,5(5):5-11. |
| |
| Authors: | WEI Zhi-xun |
| |
| Institution: | WEI Zhi-xun |
| |
| Abstract: | ＂Austin Dilemma＂ results from the issue of legality where social norms are applied in judicial proceedings by judges, that is, how to alleviate ＂retroactive dilemma＂ by institutional operations of case law so as to achieve justice in judicial judgment. Debates on ＂social propositions＂ between Dworkin and Hart have demonstrated the importance of social propositions in case law, besides, basic principles, criteria, reasoning modes and institutions developed from common law have offered comprehensive institutional safeguards for resolution of ＂retroactive dilemma＂ and justice in judgment. |
| |
| Keywords: | case law social rules justice |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
