首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

上下颌牙齿磨耗推断年龄准确性的比较
引用本文:胡志敏,;谭超,;王玉洲,;杨超朋,;张继宗. 上下颌牙齿磨耗推断年龄准确性的比较[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2014, 0(6): 33-35
作者姓名:胡志敏,  谭超,  王玉洲,  杨超朋,  张继宗
作者单位:[1]福建省厦门市公安局海沧分局,福建厦门361003; [2]中国人民公安大学,北京100076; [3]重庆市公安局大渡口区分局刑侦支队,重庆401320; [4]北京市公安局刑事侦查总队,北京100054; [5]公安部物证鉴定中心,北京100038
摘    要:
目的利用牙齿磨耗不同的分类方法分别推断上、下颌的牙齿年龄,分析各种方法推断上、下颌牙齿年龄的误差,评价上、下颌牙齿用于年龄推断的准确性。方法采用分级法与数量化法分别对164名18~46岁之间的成年人进行牙龄推断,计算出推断牙龄与实际年龄的误差,输入SPSS软件对误差的数据进行统计学分析。结果分别使用不同方法对上、下颌牙齿磨耗程度进行年龄推断的结果差别不大。结论上、下颌牙齿用于牙齿磨耗推断年龄的准确性无明显差异。

关 键 词:法医人类学  牙龄  年龄推断  牙齿磨耗

A Comparative Study on the Accuracy of Age Estimation by the Wear of Maxillary and Mandibular Teeth
Affiliation:HU Zhi-min, TAN Chao, WANG Yu-zhou, YANG Chao-peng, ZHANG Ji-zong (1. Haicang District Division of Xiomen Public Security Bureau, Xiamen 361026, China; 2. People's Public Security University of Chino, Bering 100038, China; 3. Dadukou District Division of Chongqing Public Security Bureau, Chongqing 400084, China; 4. Criminal Investigation Division of Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing 100054, China; 5.Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China)
Abstract:
Objective To examine the accuracy of different teeth wear classification methods, and analyze the errors yielded by those methods. Methods Different methods were used to estimate the age of 164 adults between 18 to 46 years old to obtain the objective errors. The data was analyzed with SPSS software. Results There was no significant difference in age estimation between the methods using maxillary and mandibular teeth. Conclusion The accuracy of age estimation by examining maxillary and mandibular teeth wear have no disparity.
Keywords:forensic anthropology  dental age  age estimation  tooth wear
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号