Characterization and Comparison of Injuries Caused by Accidental and Non‐accidental Blunt Force Trauma in Dogs and Cats |
| |
| Authors: | Nida P Intarapanich BA Emily C McCobb DVM MS Robert W Reisman DVM Elizabeth A Rozanski DVM Pichai P Intarapanich PhD |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA;2. Forensic Sciences, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY;3. Department of Mathematics, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT |
| |
| Abstract: | Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) are often difficult to distinguish from non‐accidental injury (NAI). This retrospective case–control study compared animals with known MVA trauma against those with known NAI. Medical records of 426 dogs and cats treated after MVA and 50 after NAI were evaluated. Injuries significantly associated with MVA were pelvic fractures, pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, abrasions, and degloving wounds. Injuries associated with NAI were fractures of the skull, teeth, vertebrae, and ribs, scleral hemorrhage, damage to claws, and evidence of older fractures. Odds ratios are reported for these injuries. MVA rib fractures were found to occur in clusters on one side of the body, with cranial ribs more likely to fracture, while NAI rib fractures were found to occur bilaterally with no cranial–caudal pattern. Establishing evidence‐based patterns of injury may help clinicians differentiate causes of trauma and may aid in the documentation and prosecution of animal abuse. |
| |
| Keywords: | forensic science veterinary animal dog non‐accidental injury injury blunt force trauma motor vehicle accident |
|
|
