| 预期违约若干问题探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓小云.预期违约若干问题探讨[J].河南司法警官职业学院学报,2005,3(2):64-67. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓小云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南省社会科学院,河南,郑州,450002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 大陆法系的不安抗辩权制度起到了救济期前违约的作用,实际上就是大陆法系的预期违约规则。但不安抗辩权制度只是预期违约制度的一个方面,远非预期违约制度那样全面、完善。我国《合同法》在借鉴大陆法系不安抗辩权制度的基础上,呈现出向英关法系预期违约制度逐渐靠拢的趋向。
|
| 关 键 词： | 预期违约 不安抗辩权 比较分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-2663(2005)02-0064-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年1月8日 |
Research on Anticipating Breach of Contract |
| |
| DENG Xiao-yun.Research on Anticipating Breach of Contract[J].JOurnal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College,2005,3(2):64-67. |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Xiao-yun |
| |
| Abstract: | The system of counterargument right for security in civillaw countries play role of anticipating breach of contract, which is actually the rule of civil - law countries, However, the counterargument right for security is part of the anticipating breach of contract system, far from perfection. China contract law, On base of learning from the counterargument right for security system, trend to draw close gradually to anticipating breach of contract in common - law legal family. |
| |
| Keywords: | anticipating breach of contract counterargument right for security comparative analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
