| 形式解释论与实质解释论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张广洋.形式解释论与实质解释论[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2011(5):40-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张广洋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学,上海,200042 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在构成要件的解释领域有形式解释论与实质解释论之争.形式解释论与实质解释论之争本源上是罪刑法定原则之争.一般而言,形式解释论维护罪刑法定原则的形式侧面,而实质解释论不仅维护罪刑法定原则的形式侧面,也维护罪刑法定原则的实质侧面.相较于形式解释论,实质解释论更注重刑法目的合理性,更能够实现刑罚的妥当性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 罪刑法定原则 形式解释论 实质解释论 |
The Formalistic Interpretation Theory and the Substantial Interpretation Theory |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Guang-yang |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Guang-yang |
| |
| Abstract: | In the field of interpretation to the constitutional requirements of a crime,there is a debate between the formalistic interpretation theory and the substantial interpretation theory.The debate between the formalistic interpretation theory and the substantial interpretation theory is basically the conflict of Legally Prescribed Punishment Principle for Specific Crime.Generally speaking,the formalistic interpretation theory defends the formal aspects of the principle of Legally Prescribed Punishment Principl... |
| |
| Keywords: | Legally Prescribed Punishment Principle for Specific Crime the formalistic interpretation theory the substantial interpretation theory |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
