首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

习水8.15案的刑事法分析
引用本文:刘鹏,王占洲.习水8.15案的刑事法分析[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2009,21(3):23-28.
作者姓名:刘鹏  王占洲
作者单位:贵州警官职业学院,贵州,贵阳,550005
摘    要:从定性上讲,根据目前披露的案件事实,被告人冯支洋等人嫖宿幼女的行为符合嫖宿幼女罪的构成要件。从程序上讲,习水县人民检察院依法应在法庭审理过程中要求补充侦查,但此补充侦查并非等于或必然引起撤回起诉;习水县人民检察院依法也应将案件移送遵义市人民检察院审查起诉,但这只是无管辖权的下级人民检察院向有管辖权的上级人民检察院所作的案件移送,并非改变级别管辖或提级审理。

关 键 词:习水8.15案  实体法  程序法  刑事法分析

Analysis on Criminal Law of August 15 Case in Xishui County
LIU Peng,WANG Zhan-zhou.Analysis on Criminal Law of August 15 Case in Xishui County[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2009,21(3):23-28.
Authors:LIU Peng  WANG Zhan-zhou
Institution:LIU Peng,WANG Zhan-zhou (Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,Guiyang 550005,Guizhou Province,P.R.China)
Abstract:According to facts of case revealed at present,from the qualitative analysis,the action that the defendant Fang Zhiyang and other people had sex intercourse with the girls under the age of 14 accords with the requests of crime of having sex intercourse with the girls under the age of 14. Procedurally speaking,Xishui County People's Procuratorate should request supplementary investigation during trial,but the supplementary investigation is not equal to prosecution withdrawal or is not prosecution withdrawal....
Keywords:August 15 Case in Xishui County  substantial law  procedural law  analysis on criminal law  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号