首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

线人合同问题研究
引用本文:邱福军,李明.线人合同问题研究[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2014(2):108-114.
作者姓名:邱福军  李明
作者单位:[1] 重庆警察学院,重庆401331 [2] 广州大学法学院,广东广州510006
基金项目:本文是国家社科基金项目“秘密侦查的法律规制研究”(项目编号:09BFX076)和广州市“羊城学者”项目“程序正义在我国的困境与出路”(项目编号:10A045G)的阶段性成果.
摘    要:线人协议是明确线人与侦查机关双方权利义务的合同.由于我国对线人的管理与使用缺乏完善的法律规范,实践中出现的问题很多.线人与侦查机关实际上可能形成三种合同关系:悬赏合同、劳务合同和劳动合同.在线人协议的内容确定上,线人的刑事责任豁免能否写入协议是一个关键性问题.对线人与侦查机关违约行为及其救济,追究违约责任的方式与一般的协议应有所区别.

关 键 词:合同性质  刑事责任豁免  违约行为  救济

A Discussion on Informants Contract
Qiu Fujun,Li Ming.A Discussion on Informants Contract[J].Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law,2014(2):108-114.
Authors:Qiu Fujun  Li Ming
Institution:1. Chongqing Police College, Chongqing 401331 ;2. Law School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guang- dong 510006)
Abstract:Informant agreement is a kind of contract of confirming the rights and obligations between the informant and the investigative organization. Because of the lack of sound legal norms for the proper management of the informer, lots of problems arise in practice. In fact, there are three kinds of contractual relationships between informants and investigative organization:reward contract, work contract and labor contract. In the con- tent of the Informant agreement, it is a critical issue whether the informant' s immunity from criminal responsi- bility will become effective or not. At the same time, the nonperformance by the informant and its remedies should be different with the normal agreements.
Keywords:the nature of the contract  immunity from criminal responsibility  nonperformance  remedy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号