| 我国非物质文化遗产登记制度研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许辉猛.我国非物质文化遗产登记制度研究[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2014(3):103-112. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许辉猛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南财经政法大学知识产权学院湖北武汉430073;河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州450013 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文是文化部民间文艺发展中心委托项目“民间文学艺术登记制度研究”和河南省教育厅人文社科项目“著作权规范模式演进问题研究”阶段性成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 双重保护模式导致了非物质文化遗产公权保护和私权保护登记的并立,我国分别立法的模式加剧了两种登记制度的分离和相互关系的割裂.但是非物质文化遗产公权保护和私权保护的内在统一性决定了两种登记制度的内在关联,其私权保护的特殊设计为两种登记制度的融合提供了可能性.我国应该建立统一的非物质文化遗产的登记制度.
|
| 关 键 词： | 非物质文化遗产 登记 统一登记 |
Study on the Registration System of Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage |
| |
| Xu Huimeng.Study on the Registration System of Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage[J].Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law,2014(3):103-112. |
| |
| Authors: | Xu Huimeng |
| |
| Institution: | Xu Huimeng ( 1. Institute of Intellectual Property Rights, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, Hubei 430073 ; 2. Henan University of Economies and Law law School, Zhenxzhou, Henan 450013 ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Dual protection modes of intangible cultural heritage lead to two parallel registration systems, which are registration system of public fights and of private rights protection. Our country legislation pattern respectively contributes to the separation of the two kinds of registration systems. But internal unity of public rights and private rights protection of intangible cultural heritage determines both the internal connection of the two kinds of registration systems. In addition, the special design of the private right protection provides the possibility. China should establish a unified registration system of intangible cultural heritage. |
| |
| Keywords: | intangible cultural heritage registration system a unified registration system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
