| 质疑与论证：审视台湾《刑法》修正中的保安处分制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔楠.质疑与论证：审视台湾《刑法》修正中的保安处分制度[J].吉林公安高等专科学校学报,2006,21(5):91-95. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔楠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法学院 陕西西安710063 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2005年1月7日,台湾第十六次修正《刑法》,对其中的保安处分制度作了重要修改。立法明确规定保安处分制度的相对法定主义原则、溯及力原则及不定期原则。同时,针对具体的保安处分措施,增设了处分的实质要件、延长处分期间及修改处分与《刑法》的执行顺序等。但是,此次对保安处分的修正并非成功,立法者未能重视保安处分的实质精神,仅在形式上作以修改,令人遗憾。
|
| 关 键 词： | 保安处分 相对法定主义原则 溯及力原则 不定期原则 |
Query and Argumentation: Survey the Security Punishment System in the Revised Criminal Law of Taiwan |
| |
| Cui Nan.Query and Argumentation: Survey the Security Punishment System in the Revised Criminal Law of Taiwan[J].Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy,2006,21(5):91-95. |
| |
| Authors: | Cui Nan |
| |
| Abstract: | On January 7, 2005, Taiwan revised the criminal law for the 16th time, and made great amendments to the security punishment system. It is clearly legislated that the security punishment corresponds to legal stipulation principle, tracing to the source principle and irregular principle. At the same time, essential conditions are added according to specific security punishment measures, and it prolongs the punishment period, revises the execution order of punishment and criminal law, etc. However, this revision of security punishment this time is not successful, because the legislators fail to pay attention to the essence spirit of security punishments, but make revisions in the form. Therefore, it is regrettable. |
| |
| Keywords: | Security Punishment Relatively Legal Stipulation Principle Tracing to the Source Principle Irregular Principle |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
