首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于死刑案件证明标准的思考
引用本文:朱琳.关于死刑案件证明标准的思考[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2009,22(4):31-33.
作者姓名:朱琳
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100088
摘    要:我国死刑案件证明标准目前采用和普通刑事案件相同的证明标准,这不利于被告人的生命和自由的保障。应在定罪程序和量刑程序实现分离的基础上,对量刑阶段的证明标准加以提高。同时应分清留有余地判处死缓案件与疑案的情况,并采取不同的处理方式,证明标准的适用需要死刑程序加以保障。

关 键 词:死刑案件证明标准  留有余地判处死缓案件  疑案  程序保障

Thinking on the Standard of the Death Cases
ZHU Lin.Thinking on the Standard of the Death Cases[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2009,22(4):31-33.
Authors:ZHU Lin
Institution:ZHU Lin (Graduate College of China University of Political Science and Law ,Beijing 100088, China)
Abstract:This article first analyzes the problems of proving standard for death penalty cases and then explains the current proving standard and suggests that the standard should be enhanced.About the method for the enhancement of proving standard,the article holds that the proving standard for sentencing procedure should be heightened after separating the trial procedure into conviction and sentencing procedure.Meanwhile,the article point out that the differences between suspect death penalty cases and hard death penalty cases should be realized and different measures should be taken to tackle different situations.In the end,this article emphasizes the safeguard function of death penalty procedure for using the proving standard.
Keywords:proving standard for death penalty cases  suspect death penalty cases  hard death penalty cases  safeguard function of death penalty procedure
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号