| 地方政府绩效评估体系的路径选择——福建的分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴建南,阎波.地方政府绩效评估体系的路径选择——福建的分析[J].中国行政管理,2008(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴建南 阎波 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院，西安交通大学管理学院 副院长、教授、博导，管理科学与工程专业博士生，讲师，西安710049 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地——中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心重大项目“政府公共部门绩效评估体系研究—理论、方法和路径选择”(05JJD790098)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文分析了地方政府绩效评估体系的内涵及其路径选择的实质,并从自上而下绩效评估与自"下"而上绩效评估两类活动的角度,勾勒了目前地方政府绩效评估体系的现状和发展趋势,提出通过调整评估系统的构成要素组合来发展与完善地方政府绩效评估体系。以福建省绩效评估体系的演进为例,指出发展地方政府绩效评估体系的可能路径在于,通过平衡参与评估各方的利益需求,充分发挥政府内外各个利益相关者的作用,运用综合评估标准,由各方协商确定评估指标的权重,谨慎使用评估结果,从而改善整个评估体系的绩效。
|
| 关 键 词： | 政府绩效 绩效评估体系 路径选择 制度变迁 创新 |
The Path Choice of Local Government Performance Evaluation System:On FuJian Practice |
| |
| Wu Jiannan Yan Bo Wu Jiannan is Professor and Vice-Dean of School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Yan Bo is Doctoral Candidate at School of Management of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an.The Path Choice of Local Government Performance Evaluation System:On FuJian Practice[J].Chinese Public Administration,2008(2). |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Jiannan Yan Bo Wu Jiannan is Professor and Vice-Dean of School of Public Policy and Administration Xi'an Jiaotong University Yan Bo is Doctoral Candidate at School of Management of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an |
| |
| Institution: | Wu Jiannan Yan Bo Wu Jiannan is Professor and Vice-Dean of School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Yan Bo is Doctoral Candidate at School of Management of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,710049 |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper analyzed the meaning of local government performance evaluation systems and its path choice,described the characteristics of it with two evaluation activities which are called Top-down and Bottom-up evaluation,and concluded that changing the system elements is a way to achieve the function of Local Government Performance Evaluation System.The paper also discussed practices in FuJian Province.However,it's better to balance the different needs,to allow external and internal stakeholders to join in appraisal,to make comprehensive performance standards,weight to make indicators more accurately by stakeholders' deep discussions,and also to use the evaluation result to give adequate pressure on leaders.These may enhance the evaluation system performance. |
| |
| Keywords: | government performance performance evaluation system path choice institutional change innovation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
