首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Work-related stress in Australia: The effects of legislative interventions and the cost of treatment
Authors:Robert Guthrie  Marina Ciccarelli  Angela Babic
Institution:1. Universitetsvägen 10, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden;2. British Psychological Society and Expert Witness Institute, 1 Crescent Bakery, St Georges Place, Cheltenham, GLOS GL50 3PN, UK;1. Health, Safety and Environment, Statoil ASA, Stavanger, Norway;2. Centre for Organizational Health and Development, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK;3. Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK;1. Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Vic, Australia;2. Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, Australia;1. Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 22660, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Arbouw, Dutch Health & Safety Institute in the Construction Industry, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
Abstract:The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data published in 2002 shows a continued rise in health care costs to the Australian community due to the growing number of people diagnosed with mental health disorders. Those mental health disorders may originate from a number of sources, including work and non-work-related factors. The so called work-related stress claims in all Australian jurisdictions are the most expensive form of workers compensation claim. In the most part this is due to the lengthy period of absence (duration) and complicated medical care which are characteristic of these claims. In Australia, in the last decade, attempts have been made to reduce the costs of compensable stress-related claims by imposing special legislative thresholds on such claims. This ‘back end’ approach to cost reduction has resulted in an array of legislative formula designed to exclude work-related stress claims. This article surveys the various legislative provisions dealing with work-related stress claims in Australia and provides an analysis of their effectiveness. A range of options are presented as alternatives to the exclusion of particular forms of work-related stress claims. The use of a corporate citizenship approach to the prevention and management of stress claims is also discussed as a proactive alternative to occupational safety and health legislative provisions and the workers compensation legislative exclusions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号