从“张金柱现象”到孙伟铭案的法学家“理性”——以媒体法治角色的社会责任担当为视角

孙伟铭案与张金柱案都是让社会各界大为震动的大案。媒体对张金柱案的密集报道还引发了民意求死的“张金柱现象”。而对孙伟铭案，媒体对孙伟铭及亲属在孙伟铭因为特大交通事故被判处“死刑立即执行”后，刑事死刑判决挤压民事赔偿过程中，采取给孙伟铭、孙林披“好人”、“善人”和“动人”等外衣，美化其“善意”、“伟大”或者受人尊重言行的民意求生的思路，试图将孙伟铭及亲属的保命型被动赔偿“塑造成”孙伟铭刑事案件的“悔罪积极”。这种过度美化孙伟铭及亲属的媒体报道，是媒体没有很好履行其社会责任，准确定位其在特大事件、重大事件中报道中的社会责任；而法学家在死刑判决下达后也站出来对判决结果进行“不理性”、“感情用事”的指责，对于这些不良的行为习惯，应当给予纠正。

Jurists' Rationalism in the Case of Zhang Jin-zhu and Sun Wei-ming——In View of Social Responsibility taken by the Media

Zhang Jin-zhu and Sun Wei-ming case is significant for the community of major shock, while the Zhang Jin-zhu＇s case has also sparked intense media interest and public opinion to die for ＂Zhang Jin-zhu phenomenon.＂ And later, the media in Sun Wei-ming and his relatives because of serious traffic accident has been sentenced to ＂the immediate implementation of the death penalty＂, the criminal death sentence compression civil compensation process, to take to the Sun Wei-ming, Sun Lin ＂good＂, ＂good man＂ and ＂moving ＂and other coat and beautify its＂ goodwill ＂and＂ great ＂or the words and deeds of the people respected the idea of survival, trying to Sun Wei-ming and his families a life-saving-type passive compensation,＂molded into the ＂Sun Wei-ming criminal cases＂ repentance positive ＂, this landscaping Sun Wei-ming and relatives over the media reports that the media not properly fulfill its social responsibilities, accurate positioning of its big events, major events reported in the results of social responsibility, as well as jurists, after the death sentence handed down, and stood up to an ＂irrational ＂,＂emotional ＂corranents are bad habits, should be corrected.