首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Use of Craniofacial Superimposition in Historic Investigation
Authors:James A Bailey PhD  G B Brogdon MD  Brandon Nichols MD
Institution:1. Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, , Wilmington, NC, 28401;2. Department of Radiology, University of South AL Medical Center, , Mobile, AL, 36617
Abstract:A skeleton discovered in Grand Forks, North Dakota was purported to belong to Clelland “Clell” Miller, a James‐Younger gang member, who was killed during the Northfield Bank robbery on September 7, 1876. A 3‐D image from a computer tomography (CT) scan of the skull was obtained, and a craniofacial superimposition was conducted to determine if the skull could belong to Miller. The superimposition method used in this case was to overlay the CT image of the skull onto Miller's postmortem photograph. In addition to the craniofacial superimposition, the images were juxtaposed to compare similarities or differences in facial morphology between the skull and photograph. Superimposition methods can be used to exclude identifications; however, they should not be used as a conclusive method for identification. In this case, there were sufficient similarities between the skull and Miller's photograph; therefore, the skull could not be eliminated as possibly being that of Miller.
Keywords:forensic science  craniofacial superimposition  computer tomography  James‐Younger gang  Northfield bank robbery  Clelland Miller  facial morphology
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号