首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Error and its Meaning in Forensic Science
Authors:Angi M Christensen PhD  Christian M Crowder PhD  Stephen D Ousley PhD  Max M Houck PhD
Institution:1. George Mason University, , Fairfax, VA;2. Office of Chief Medical Examiner, , New York City, NY;3. Mercyhurst University, , Erie, PA;4. Department of Forensic Sciences, Consolidated Forensic Laboratory, , Washington, DC
Abstract:The discussion of “error” has gained momentum in forensic science in the wake of the Daubert guidelines and has intensified with the National Academy of Sciences' Report. Error has many different meanings, and too often, forensic practitioners themselves as well as the courts misunderstand scientific error and statistical error rates, often confusing them with practitioner error (or mistakes). Here, we present an overview of these concepts as they pertain to forensic science applications, discussing the difference between practitioner error (including mistakes), instrument error, statistical error, and method error. We urge forensic practitioners to ensure that potential sources of error and method limitations are understood and clearly communicated and advocate that the legal community be informed regarding the differences between interobserver errors, uncertainty, variation, and mistakes.
Keywords:forensic science  error  limitation  forensic anthropology     Daubert     mistake
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号