污染环境罪主观方面评析

《刑法修正案（八）》对重大环境污染事故罪进行了重大修改,罪名也变为污染环境罪.一般认为,修改前的重大环境污染事故罪是过失犯罪,但对于修改后的污染环境罪是故意还是过失犯罪,理论上颇有争议,存有过失说、双重罪过形式说及故意说等观点.但过失说及双重罪过形式说均不能正确反映本罪修改的实质意义,不利于正确认定污染环境罪,不利于有效打击污染环境的行为,因而不足取.无论从文理的角度,还是从论理的角度,污染环境罪都应当是故意犯罪.将污染环境罪解释为故意犯罪,有利于惩治污染环境的犯罪行为.

An Analysis of the subject of the Crime of Polluting the Environment

The Amendment VIII to the Criminal Law of the crime of major accident of polluting the environment and c environment. It is generally believed that the former charge is that whether the later charge is an unintentional crime or an People＇ s Republic of China greatly revised the hanged the charge to be the crime of polluting the an unintentional crime while it is a controversial topic intentional crime, which are included, together with double crimes, in the several opinions existing. Neither the opinion of unintentional crime nor the one of double crimes can reflect the real meaning of the revision, help the cognition of this crime, -or attack effectively the acts of polluting the environment, so they should not be adopted. Considering of the coherence of writing or the convincing argument, the crime of polluting the environment should be an intentional crime. In addition, this interpretation is good to punish the criminal actions.