非法供述排除规则问题反思

被告人供述具有直接证据的属性,因其能为案件侦破提供丰富的证据线索而倍受侦查人员的重视。在现行司法体制和诉讼结构下,被告人供述证据的非法获得与使用滋生了严重的法律和社会问题。刑讯逼供泛滥、案卷笔录中心主义的法庭裁判模式等一系列问题导致了一批冤假错案的集中爆发,也催生了刑事诉讼法的再修改。但新修改的刑事诉讼法,仍是立足原有司法体制土壤中的技术革新,难以弥补体制本身的漏洞,实践中有关非法供述证据研究方向的偏离、相关举证责任倒置规定的流于形式都反映了非法供述证据在新刑诉时代仍将存在排除上的障碍。

Reflections on the Problems in the Exclusive Rule of Illegal Statement

The statement of the accused has the attribute of direct evidence. It＇s always paid much attention by investigators because it can provide abundant clues to evidence. In the current judicature mechanism and structure of action, to obtain and use illegally the statement of the accused have caused many serious problems in law and the society. The extorting confessions by torture and adjudication of dossier notes centralism made a large number of unjust, false and wrong cases. At the same time, the Criminal Procedure Law was forced to be revised once again. But the revised Criminal Procedure Law is just a technical reform based on the old judicature mechanism and can hardly repair the loopholes of the mechanism itself. Both the wrong study of illegal statement as evidence and the inversion of burden of proof mean that there will be hurdles in the exclusion of illegal statement in the new ages of criminal prosecution.