公安机关协商性刑事案件解决机制研究

近年来，刑事和解制度成为我国理论界与实务界的热点。公安机关对于协商性案件的解决也是在这个大潮流下孕育而生，有些学者认为对于公安机关协商性案件必须进行严格的限制。原因在于公安机关只是主要的侦查机关，主要负责案件事实的查明，而对于案件处理的法律意见及其裁定．主要是司法机关（人民检察院和人民法院）的职责，公安机关协商性案件的范围及权限必须最小且须受到严格的限制，否则会越权且缺少监督，但是，我们必须注意到。正是由于公安机关是主要的侦查机关。且处于大多数案件的立案侦查阶段，即使对于协商性案件的范围进行限制，这些案件．绝对数量上仍然必不可少的包含大量的轻伤害之类的可以协商解决的案件。因此。对于公安机关协商性案件解决机制及其程序规范化的研究，具有重要而迫切的现实意义。

The Research On The Public Security Organs To Solve Criminal Cases Consultative Mechanism

In recent years, the criminal settlement system has become China＇s theorists and practitioners of the hot spots, the public security organs to solve the case for the consultative also a major trend in the breeding and health, and some scholars believe that consultative cases for the public security organs must be strictly limited, because is that the public security authority is only a major investigation, is mainly responsible for the identification of facts of the case and the cases dealing with the legal advice and ruled that the main judicial organ （People＇s Procuratorate and the people＇s court） duties, the public security organs of the scope and consultative cases permission must be a minimum and be subject to strict restrictions, otherwise they will be ultra vires and the lack of supervision, however, We must note that it is precisely because the public security organs is the main investigation, and in most cases on file for investigation phase, even for the consultative cases to restrict the scope of these cases, the absolute numbers are still essential to contain a large number of Light damage can be negotiated settlement of the class of cases, therefore, for the public security authorities to resolve cases of consultative mechanisms and procedures for standardization of research has important practical and urgent significance .