| 论轻微暴力索财案件的定性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张永红,兰志龙.论轻微暴力索财案件的定性[J].吉林公安高等专科学校学报,2007,22(6):41-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张永红 兰志龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学 湖南湘潭411105(张永红)，湖南长沙市中级人民法院 湖南长沙411000(兰志龙) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 轻微暴力索财案件的定性在司法实践中分歧较大，主要集中在抢劫、敲诈勒索与寻衅滋事三个罪名上。定性分歧的主要原因在于立法规定的概括性、理论阐释的局限性、案件事实的复杂性以及法官认识的差异性。要实现对此类案件的准确定性，应该在澄清理论误区的基础上进行综合判断。
|
| 关 键 词： | 轻微暴力索财案件 定性 抢劫罪 敲诈勒索罪 寻衅滋事罪 |
On Determine Nature of Slight Violent Act of Asking for Money |
| |
| Zhang Yonghong,Lan Zhilong.On Determine Nature of Slight Violent Act of Asking for Money[J].Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy,2007,22(6):41-45. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Yonghong Lan Zhilong |
| |
| Institution: | Zhang Yonghong, Lan Zhilong(Xiangtan University, Xiangtan Hunan , 411105;Intermediate Court of Changsha in Hunan Province, Hunan Changsha, 411000) |
| |
| Abstract: | There are many viewpoints of nature of slight violent act of asking for money, there are some very dispute claims on three accusations which are rob, blackmail and crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles. Recapitulative legislation, limitations of theory elaboration, complexity of law case and different cognition are the reasons of disputation. We should make decision on the stage of settle academic misunderstandings, if we want to determine nature exactly. |
| |
| Keywords: | slight violent act of asking for money determine nature rob blackmail crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
