首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论新刑诉法司法鉴定问题的修改
引用本文:陈邦达,胡广平.论新刑诉法司法鉴定问题的修改[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2012(5):61-66.
作者姓名:陈邦达  胡广平
作者单位:[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610064 [2]上海市闵行区人民检查院研究室,上海201199
摘    要:2012年新《刑事诉讼法》对司法鉴定问题作出几处修改:将"鉴定结论"改为"鉴定意见",确立了生物样本采集制度,对鉴定人之出庭范围、人身安全保护、拒不出庭后果作出具体规定,并增设有专门知识的人参与刑事诉讼制度。修改之处在转变盲目依赖鉴定的观念、增强鉴定质证、吸纳当事人主义合理因素等方面呈现诸多亮点,但有关生物样本采集程序以及鉴定人出庭效果等方面依然有待完善。

关 键 词:司法鉴定  新刑诉法  修改  样本采集  鉴定人出庭

Comments on Amendments to Expert Testimony in the New Criminal Procedural Law
CHEN Bang-da,HU Guang-ping.Comments on Amendments to Expert Testimony in the New Criminal Procedural Law[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2012(5):61-66.
Authors:CHEN Bang-da  HU Guang-ping
Institution:1. School of Law,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064 ,China; 2. Shanghai Minhang Municipyl People's Prosecution,Shanghai 201100,China)
Abstract:New amendments to expert testimony have been presented in the new Criminal Procedural Law in 2012. It modifies appellation of "expert opinion" instead of "expert conclusion", sets up an institu- tion of biological sample collection,and makes detail regulations on the range of judicial experts'appearing in court,the protection of their personal safety,and the result of their refusal to appearing in court. It new- ly adds that professionals can take part in criminal procedure. There are some highlights of the amendments such as transforming the idea of relying blindly on forensic identification, strengthening evidence confirma- tion of expert testimony and accepting rational factors of adversary system. However, it still needs to im- prove the institution of biological sample collection, the effect of judicial experts appearing in court and so on.
Keywords:expert testimony  the new criminal procedural law  amendment  sample collection  judicialexperts appearing in court
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号