首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

量刑程序控制机制的模式化分析及本土化建构
引用本文:陈巧燕.量刑程序控制机制的模式化分析及本土化建构[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2009(3):92-96.
作者姓名:陈巧燕
作者单位:福建省委党校法学教研部;
摘    要:从实体性和程序性的机制上有效约束和控制法官的自由裁量权,是实现司法公正和人权保障价值的必然要求。然而,我国将量刑权的制约问题囿于实体法研究的领域,没有从程序制约这一维度审思制约量刑权的有效对策,所以难以从根本上克减量刑失当的现象。由于我国的国情和法制传统,导致我国的量刑程序改革不可能全盘移植英美国家的独立量刑模式,唯许多大陆法系国家所倡导的“审判二分法”才是克服“水土不服”的良药。我们应该以此为基点,充分吸收和借鉴独立量刑模式的合理要素,继续发扬大陆法系自身的传统优势,不断推进和完善我国的量刑程序制度改革,建立相应的本土化的量刑程序控制机制。

关 键 词:刑罚裁量权  程序制约模式  比较法考察  本土化建构

The Modelling Analysis and Local Construction of Sentencing Procedure Control Mechanism
CHEN Qiao-yan.The Modelling Analysis and Local Construction of Sentencing Procedure Control Mechanism[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2009(3):92-96.
Authors:CHEN Qiao-yan
Institution:Staff Room of Law;Fujian Provincial Committee Party School;Fuzhou 350001;China
Abstract:Constraining effectively and controlling judge's discretion in the substantive and procedural mechanisms are the inevitable requirements to realize judicial justice and the value of the human rights. However,theoretical research on jurisprudence in this field in China is still in "a leg walk" state. Restriction problem of sentencing power is limited in the filed of substantive law research,instead,thinking of the effective countermeasures of restricting penalty power from procedural restriction's dimension,...
Keywords:measuring penalty right  procedure restriction modes  a view of comparative law  local construction  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号