| 从刑事诉讼法48条谈鉴定意见的证明力 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李剑,张德英.从刑事诉讼法48条谈鉴定意见的证明力[J].贵阳市委党校学报,2012(2):41-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李剑 张德英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 贵州警官职业学院,贵州贵阳,550005 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 科学证据在司法实践中的证明效力问题研究(编号:10QN46) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在司法实践中，随着科学技术的发展，鉴定技术的运用越来越广泛。由于鉴定技术的专业性、科学性，法庭很少会去质疑鉴定结论的科学可靠性。但实际上，鉴定结论并无预定的证明力，它本质上应该是一种专家意见，而非绝对的、不容置疑的不变真理。新刑事诉讼法第48条将“鉴定结论”修改为“鉴定意见”，反映出法律更加谨慎、理智地看待鉴定意见证据的证明力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 鉴定结论 鉴定意见 证明力 刑事诉讼法 |
On the Probative Force of Appraisal Opinions from the Amendment of A.48 of Criminal Procedure Law |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jian ZHANG Deying |
| |
| Institution: | LI Jian;ZHANG Deying(Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College Judicial Appraisal Center,Guiyang Guizhou,550005) |
| |
| Abstract: | Appraisal technologies are being frequently used in judicial practice.Due to its professionalism and scientificalness,appraisal opinions are seldom questioned in court.Appraisal opinions,however in fact,are expert opinions but not absolute truth,whose probative force should be considered objectively. |
| |
| Keywords: | appraisal conclusion appraisal opinion probative force Criminal Procedure Law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
