| 侦查权权力属性热议之冷思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄豹.侦查权权力属性热议之冷思考[J].湖北警官学院学报,2007,20(5):24-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄豹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北警官学院法律系 湖北武汉430034 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2005年度司法部部级项目《法治之下的警察行政权的合理构建》(05SFB2014)的阶段性成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国学术界对侦查权权力属性的争议主要集中在它是属于司法权还是行政权或司法行政权。我国不实行三权分立制度,因此立法权、司法权和行政权的分类方法只具有纯学术研究意义。以这种三权分类来划分侦查权,必须注意中国不同的国情和司法制度。侦查权力属性争议其实意义不大,我国当前更需要解决的是侦查权权力内容的法定、如何对侦查权进行制约与监督、侦查权行使中的人权保障和救济等问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侦查权力 行政权 司法权 权力法定 权利保障与救济 |
Thinking about attribute discussion of investigating power |
| |
| Huang Bao.Thinking about attribute discussion of investigating power[J].JOurnal of Hubei University of Police,2007,20(5):24-28. |
| |
| Authors: | Huang Bao |
| |
| Abstract: | Academic concentration about attribute of investigating power is on judicial powers,administrative power and judiciary administrative power mainly.There is no tri-partite political system in our country,which means this classification method has pure academic research significance only.This classification method must pay attention to Chinese diversity conditions and judicial systems.The attribute dispute of investigating power is not of significance. |
| |
| Keywords: | investigating power administrative power judicial powers power gived legally ensure the human rights and relieve |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
