滚珠合同可否构成侵权责任

滚珠合同是从格式合同变迁而来,合同法律制度对格式合同规定了不利提供方解释原则。在滚珠合同中,运营商一头连接增值商,一头连结消费者,一方面为消费者提供信息服务网站,并且按时间或者按信息流量代理增值商收取费用;另一方面为增值商提供客源,并且按照代收金额分取固定比例的费用,实际上就是中介人。所以,当增值商违法时,增值商须承担法律责任,而作为中介人的运营商也应按照我国《注册会计师法》和《律师法》等法律精神,对损失承担连带责任。

The Issue Regarding Tortious Liability of Ball Contract

Ball contract comes from standard form contract and contract legal system presents negative explanation principle to the provider of the latter. Connecting value-added business to customers, ball contract acts as an intermediary in that it provides information website for clients and meanwhile charges customers in place of value-added business on the basis of time spent or information flow.On the other hand,the operators provide customers for value-added business and collect fees in proportion.Consequently, as an intermediary, when value-added business violates the relative law, the intermediary, coupled with the former, should bear the legal responsibility. In accordance with CPA Law, Lawyers′ Law and relatively legal principles, intermediaries should assume joint and several liabilities.