对司法推定若干基础问题的研究

在对案件进行裁判的过程中,遇到实体法缺乏具体规范时,基于何种理由认定有关案件事实,成为法官首先要解决的问题。适用司法推定,能够帮助法官摆脱案件事实不清、难以裁判的尴尬。长期以来,学界对于司法推定的相关基础问题缺乏应有的关注。对司法推定的概念、内在属性、构成要件、适用规则、诉讼价值、法律效果、司法推定权的行使和非理性因素的影响等问题进行系统的研究,能够在很大程度上揭示司法推定的本来面目,并助力于该制度诉讼机能的正常发挥。

On Some Fundamental Questions concerning Judicial Presumption

When hearing a case, the judge must decide how the facts of a case can be affirmed in case there are no concrete norms in the substantial law. By applying judicial presumption, the judge may shake off the yoke of indecisiveness in trial caused by unclear facts of the case. For a long time, the academic circle has not been aware of the fundamental questions on judicial presumption. There is no systematic study concerning judicial presumption＇ s conception, intrinsic attribute, key components, applicable rules, litigation values, legal effect, and how the judicial presumption shall be applied and the influence of irrational factors. Such systematic study will greatly reveal the true features of judicial presumption and thus promote its function in lawsuit.