Elected leaders and collective land: Farmers’ evaluation of village leaders’ performance in rural China |
| |
Authors: | John James Kennedy Scott Rozelle Shi Yaojiang |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) the Department of Political Science, the University of Kansas, Lawrence;(2) the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, the University of California, Davis;(3) the School of Business and Management at Northwest University (Xibei daxue), Xian, China |
| |
Abstract: | Previous studies on village elections have focused on the election process, but few have examined post-election outcomes related
to local land management systems. Land is the most important resource in Chinese villages, but land management and reallocation
are the chief responsibility for elected village leaders. Previous studies show that villager attitudes toward the “fairness”
of land reallocations and the type of village elections vary across villages. Some villages have an open election/nomination
process while other villages have “closed” or unfair elections. We found that openly elected leaders are more accountable
to villagers and that their land management decisions do reflect villager preferences for “fair” land reallocation. Our findings
are based on a 2000–2001 survey of 34 villages in rural Shaanxi province.
Rozelle is also a member of the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics.
We acknowledge the finical support of the Fulbright Fellowship and the University of California, Pacific Rim Research Fellowship.
We want to thank the three anonymous reviews as well as Kevin O’Brien and Li Lianjiang for their comments and suggestions.
In addition, we want to thank our friends and colleagues at Northwest University, Xian for all their help, collaboration and
support. This paper was first presented in Chinese at the “Contemporary Rural Chinese Social Life” conference held at Hong
Kong Polytechnic University November 21st and 22nd 2002. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|